on reading liberal blogs on what happened in Massachuesettes

A funny thing happened the other day. The machine candidate lost, and the fingers began to point, and the general concensus of the liberals was that Coakley had a lock, was a lousey campaigner and based on that she lost. Absolutely nothing in these liberal blogs was made of the thought that perhaps her message was problem. The general gist of the talk is that Obama's ideas are still great, and we can still push our agenda, and we must continue. Well, Harry Reid finally got the message, and he suggested that perhaps they have to pare down their original expectations. Mr. Obama got the message, at least his teleprompter did, and his reading of the message was something along the lines that the reason the voters weren't buying into his thoughts was the lack of transparency, do you think? He has made more addresses than any president in the last 40 years, his message is as plain as the nose on his face. He had his chance, and he blew it, but the key thought is, that he attempted to sell this by calling it something that it was not. By not carrying through on any of his promises, he lost the left as well as the right. The center sways with the breeze so to speak, and now he is in trouble, his ratings will continue to free fall. The die hard liberals will continue to support him, but he is done. The liberal commentators still do not get it, they think that a president can allow terrorists to attack this country and it has no effect. They think that if in some miraculous way the double digit unemployment bottoms out, things will change, but they do not understand, the president's job is provide a cover of security, if the perception is that he doesn't know what he's doing, he's gone. This president has allowed his advisors to set up terrorist trials in civilian courts, he has multiplied the threats, he has unilaterally released terrorists, who are now attempting to kill us again. He didn't know what he was doing a year ago, and he still is floundering. The reason is because his closest advisors are clueless, they are political appointees who for six or eight years did not listen or see what Bush was dealing with, they also felt that Clinton's attempts at dealing with stuff in the midst of his congressional difficulties, was a case of Wagging the dog, they felt Clinton was going to war with an imaginary foe (Bin Laden) and they didn't support him either. So, now, as the mistakes pile up, we finally see who we elected, a clueless ideologue, who just can't walk and chew gum... Now that it is apparent, that there really are no ideas for energy independence, that there really aren't any ideas for fixing the economics that Bush left him, that there really aren't any ideas for dealing with Iran, that because of these glaring deficits, Israel will end up destroying Iran at the behest of this government, because just like Neville Chamberlain, this president has declared peace in his time, without achieving anything. The Nobel people not withstanding seem clueless also. Perhaps, they give their awards out on expectations, not actions.